Section Navigation
National Competitive Grants Program
Breadcrumb Navigation
Discovery Projects
Selection Report for funding Commencing in 2008
- Overview
- Objectives
- Selection Process
- Selection Criteria
- Funding Duration
- National Research Priorities
- Summary of Outcomes
- Early Career Researcher Proposals
- Fellowships
- Historical Outcomes for Fellowships
- Partnerships to Fund Fellowships
- Gender of Participants
- International Collaboration
- Outcomes by Administering Organisation
- Scheme Budget
Overview
Recognising the importance of fundamental research to the national innovation system, Discovery Projects supports excellent research projects and individual researchers and teams of researchers. Under Discovery Projects, ARC Fellowships provide opportunities for emerging and established researchers to undertake research of national and international significance.
[top]
Objectives
The objectives of Discovery Projects are to:
- support excellent fundamental research by individuals and teams;
- enhance the scale and focus of research in the National Research Priorities;
- assist researchers to undertake their research in conditions most conducive to achieving best results;
- expand Australia's knowledge base and research capability;
- foster the international competitiveness of Australian research; and
- encourage research training in high-quality research environments.
[top]
Selection Process
The closing date for Discovery Projects proposals was 2 March 2007. Assessment of proposals was undertaken by the ARC College of Experts, which:
- assigned independent readers/assessors to review the proposals;
- sought Applicants' comments on assessors' reports;
- identified ineligible proposals;
- ranked each proposal relative to the others on the basis of the proposal, the assessors' reports and Applicants' responses to those assessments;
- assessed and recommended budgets; and
- prepared funding recommendations for submission to the CEO of the ARC.
The CEO considered the recommendations of the ARC College of Experts and the ARC Quality and Scrutiny Committee before making recommendations to the Minister who, in accordance with the ARC Act, determined the funding outcomes.
Unless otherwise specified, figures presented in this report exclude withdrawn proposals.
[top]
Selection Criteria
The assessment of proposals was based on the scheme's selection criteria:
- investigator(s)' track record relative to opportunities and capacity to undertake the research; (40%)
- significance of and innovation in the proposed research; (30%)
- approach and methodology; and (20%)
- national benefit. (10%)
[top]
Funding Duration
Funding for Discovery Projects projects may be awarded for one to five years subject to parliamentary appropriation and the provisions of the Australian Research Council Act 2001 (the ARC Act). Australian Postdoctoral Fellowships (APDs) are awarded for a standard duration of three years, but a four-year research and teaching option is available. Australian Research Fellowships (ARFs), Queen Elizabeth II Fellowships (QEIIs) and Australian Professorial Fellowships (APFs) are awarded for a standard duration of five years.
Table 1 shows that the average duration of projects funded has risen from 3.15 years in 2004 to 3.29 years in 2008.
Table 1: Average duration of projects: funding commencing in calendar years 2004 to 2008
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average number of requested years |
3.39 |
3.43 |
3.5 |
3.62 |
3.59 |
Average number of funded years |
3.15 |
3.16 |
3.18 |
3.28 |
3.29 |
[top]
National Research Priorities
Within this round, 3,539 of the 4,112 Discovery Projects proposals considered were identified by their proponents as addressing a National Research Priority. This represents 86.1% of proposals considered. Of those 3,539 proposals, 757 (21.4%) were approved for funding, representing 86.2% of the total 878 proposals approved for funding.
The overall commitment for proposals addressing National Research Priorities is $265,435,575 (88.2% of the total funding).
The greatest amount of funding ($127,126,140) is for projects in the area of Frontier Technologies for Building and Transforming Australian Industries.
Table 2: Numbers of proposals and success rates for Discovery Projects by National Research Priority
National Research Priority Area |
Proposals received |
Proposals approved |
Success rate % |
Funds over project life for approved proposals $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
None selected |
573 |
121 |
21.1% |
$35,360,828 |
An Environmentally Sustainable Australia |
668 |
140 |
21.0% |
$52,534,346 |
Promoting and Maintaining Good Health |
759 |
170 |
22.4% |
$50,014,130 |
Frontier Technologies for Building and Transforming Australian
Industries |
1520 |
328 |
21.6% |
$127,126,140 |
Safeguarding Australia |
592 |
119 |
20.1% |
$35,760,959 |
Total proposals |
4112 |
878 |
21.4% |
$300,796,403 |
Total priority proposals |
3539 |
757 |
21.4% |
$265,435,575 |
% within priority areas |
86.1% |
86.2% |
88.2% |
[top]
Summary of Outcomes
The ARC received 4,121 proposals of which nine were withdrawn after submission. Of the 4,112 proposals which were considered for funding commencing in 2008, 878 were approved for funding and 3,234 were not approved for funding; including 91 that were deemed ineligible (that is, they did not satisfy the eligibility criteria and/or other requirements for the submission of proposals). On the basis of these recommendations, the overall success rate for proposals is 21.4%, compared with the 20.4% success rate for proposals considered for funding commencing in 2007.
The 878 recommended proposals represent a funding commitment of $93,479,736 in 2008 and a funding commitment of $300,796,403 over five years.
Table 3: Numbers of proposals and success rates for Discovery Projects for funding commencing in calendar years 2005 to 2008
Number of proposals: |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Received |
3,441 |
3,766 |
4,047 |
4,121 |
Withdrawn |
27 |
24 |
14 |
9 |
Funded |
1,055 |
917 |
822 |
878 |
Success Rate % |
30.9% |
24.5% |
20.4% |
21.4% |
Table 4: Numbers of proposals and success rates for Discovery Projects by discipline group
Discipline group * |
Proposals considered |
Proposals approved |
Success rate % |
Requested funds over project
life for approved Proposals
$ |
Funds over project life for approved Proposals $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSB |
748 |
160 |
21.4% |
$103,731,329 |
$60,201,607 |
EE |
479 |
94 |
19.6% |
$72,805,725 |
$43,784,915 |
HCA |
715 |
150 |
21.0% |
$68,209,674 |
$42,323,739 |
MIC |
637 |
135 |
21.2% |
$85,925,057 |
$43,103,236 |
PCG |
696 |
157 |
22.6% |
$119,101,816 |
$62,626,088 |
SBE |
837 |
182 |
21.7% |
$82,280,515 |
$48,756,818 |
Total |
4,112 |
878 |
21.4% |
$532,054,116 |
$300,796,403 |
* BSB = Biological Sciences and Biotechnology; EE = Engineering and Environmental Sciences; HCA = Humanities and Creative Arts; MIC = Mathematics, Information and Communication Sciences; PCG = Physics, Chemistry and Geoscience; SBE = Social, Behavioural and Economic Sciences
The average first-year funding per approved project is $106,469. The corresponding figure for 2007 was $105,019.
Table 5: Average first-year funding per project, for funding commencing in calendar years 2005 to 2008
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
Average first-year funding $ |
$94,340 |
$103,768 |
$105,019 |
$106,469 |
The average funding per approved project for 2008 is 65.4% of the average amount requested, which is higher than the corresponding figure for 2007 (64.3%). Discipline group percentages are shown in Table 6.
Table 6: Funding requested and approved for Discovery Projects proposals, for the 2008 calendar year
Discipline group |
Average requested funding per approved proposal for 2008 $ |
Average funding per approved proposal for 2008 $ |
Average approved funding as a % of average requested funding for 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|
BSB |
$177,999 |
$116,154 |
65.3% |
EE |
$202,743 |
$142,559 |
70.3% |
HCA |
$128,368 |
$88,141 |
68.7% |
MIC |
$167,877 |
$99,940 |
59.5% |
PCG |
$194,526 |
$123,978 |
63.7% |
SBE |
$126,347 |
$84,159 |
66.6% |
All Disciplines |
$162,861 |
$106,469 |
65.4% |
Table 7: Average funding per project over project life, for funding commencing in calendar years 2005 to 2008
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
Average funding over project life $ |
$282,030 |
$298,350 |
$334,267 |
$342,593 |
[top]
Early Career Researcher Proposals
For the purposes of Discovery Projects proposals for funding commencing in 2008, Early Career Researchers (ECRs) are identified as researchers who have a PhD, or equivalent research qualification or experience, awarded on or after 1 March 2002. The ARC has identified funds to support Early Career Researchers within Discovery Projects, including through Early Career Researcher-only proposals (that is, proposals in which all the nominated researchers are Early Career Researchers).
ECR-only proposals are assessed against the same criteria as other Discovery Projects proposals.
ECR-only proposals accounted for 742 of the proposals considered, with 128 ECR-only proposals approved for funding commencing in 2008. This represents a success rate of 17.3% for ECR-only proposals.
Table 8 provides details of numbers, success rates and funding levels for ECR-only proposals and success rates by discipline group.
Table 8: Numbers of and success rates for ECR-only proposals by discipline group
Discipline group |
ECR-only proposals considered |
ECR-only proposals approved for funding |
Success rate % |
Approved funding for calendar year 2008 for ECR-only proposals $ |
ECR-only proposals: % of total funding approved for calendar year
2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSB |
105 |
18 |
17.1% |
$2,170,933 |
11.7% |
EE |
79 |
16 |
20.3% |
$1,281,396 |
9.6% |
HCA |
166 |
21 |
12.7% |
$1,721,755 |
13.0% |
MIC |
122 |
23 |
18.9% |
$1,770,618 |
13.1% |
PCG |
126 |
29 |
23.0% |
$3,056,384 |
15.7% |
SBE |
144 |
21 |
14.6% |
$1,636,645 |
10.8% |
Total |
742 |
128 |
17.3% |
$11,637,731 |
12.4% |
Table 9: Success rates of proposals involving one or more ECR participants*, for funding commencing in calendar years 2004 to 2008
Discipline |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSB |
21.1% |
28.5% |
23.3% |
18.4% |
17.2% |
EE |
28.6% |
30.2% |
20.9% |
23.0% |
20.0% |
HCA |
22.0% |
22.6% |
18.5% |
15.3% |
15.2% |
MIC |
25.3% |
29.5% |
22.5% |
20.9% |
19.5% |
PCG |
27.2% |
29.8% |
21.3% |
19.0% |
22.8% |
SBE |
22.4% |
25.0% |
20.3% |
12.7% |
20.6% |
Total |
24.1% |
27.4% |
21.0% |
17.8% |
19.3% |
* These are proposals where at least one of the researchers nominated as a Chief Investigator, Partner Investigator or Fellowship candidate is an ECR. They include ECR-Only Proposals (where all named participants are ECRs), as well as proposals in which there are non-ECR participants.
Table 10 shows the funding allocations for proposals for funding commencing 2004-2008 and the percentage of total funds allocated to projects involving ECRs. This indicates that the highest percentage of funding to projects involving ECRs over the last five years is for projects commencing in 2007. For projects commencing in 2008, the total amount of funding allocated to projects with ECRs is $105,392,482.
Table 10: Funding allocations for projects involving ECR participants, for funding commencing in calendar years 2004 to 2008
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Funding allocations for projects involving ECRs $ |
$65,950,618 |
$98,824,695 |
$87,890,148 |
$98,620,487 |
$105,392,482 |
Funding allocations for all projects $ |
$237,946,364 |
$297,541,647 |
$273,586,773 |
$274,767,586 |
$300,796,403 |
% of total funds for all projects allocated to projects involving ECRs |
27.7% |
33.2% |
32.1% |
35.9% |
35.0% |
[top]
Fellowships
A number of different types of fellowship are offered in Discovery Projects. Researchers are encouraged to tailor their proposals to their specific research needs and proposals may request funding for one or more fellowship/s together with research project support. (Fellowship candidates who do not request project funding are required to demonstrate that their research costs will be supported by the Administering Organisation.)
The ARC offers three categories of fellowship under Discovery Projects:
- Australian Postdoctoral Fellowship (APD) – offered for a duration of three or four years;
- Australian Research Fellowship (ARF) and Queen Elizabeth II Fellowship (QEII) – offered for a duration of five years; and
- Australian Professorial Fellowship (APF) – offered for a duration of five years.
ARFs and QEIIs are treated as a single category, with the top candidates being awarded QEII Fellowships. All fellowships are tenable at approved universities and certain museums and herbaria. In addition, APDs and QEIIs are tenable at other approved organisations, which provide an appropriate training environment.
Of the 4,112 proposals considered, 1,201 included requests for a total of 1,228 fellowships. The minimum number of fellowships to be awarded in this round is 175 (110 APDs, 50 ARF/QEIIs, and 15 APFs), although the 50:50 salary option (see table 16) has enabled the ARC to fund a larger number. In total, 206 fellowships were approved for funding, representing an ARC salary and salary-related on-costs support commitment for new fellows of $16,628,398 for the calendar year 2008.
Table 11 shows that the average success rate across all discipline groups for fellowships is 16.8%. Table 12 shows success rates by discipline group for APDs, ARF/QEIIs and APFs.
Table 11: Numbers of and success rates for Discovery Projects fellowship candidates by discipline group
| Discipline group | Fellowships requested | Fellowships approved | Success rate % |
|---|---|---|---|
BSB |
235 |
40 |
17.0% |
EE |
133 |
20 |
15.0% |
HCA |
230 |
36 |
15.7% |
MIC |
159 |
29 |
18.2% |
PCG |
315 |
52 |
16.5% |
SBE |
156 |
29 |
18.6% |
Total |
1,228 |
206 |
16.8% |
Table 12: Numbers of and success rates for APD, ARF/QEII and APF candidates by discipline group
| APD | ARF/QEII | APF | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discip-line group |
Request-ed |
Approved |
Success rate
% |
Request-ed |
Approved |
Success rate % |
Request-ed |
Approved |
Success rate % |
BSB |
124 |
20 |
16.1 |
90 |
16 |
17.8 |
21 |
4 |
19.0 |
EE |
76 |
12 |
15.8 |
38 |
5 |
13.2 |
19 |
3 |
15.8 |
HCA |
152 |
24 |
15.8 |
44 |
7 |
15.9 |
34 |
5 |
14.7 |
MIC |
85 |
17 |
20.0 |
43 |
7 |
16.3 |
31 |
5 |
16.1 |
PCG |
143 |
29 |
20.3 |
122 |
16 |
13.1 |
50 |
7 |
14.0 |
SBE |
96 |
18 |
18.8 |
35 |
7 |
20.0 |
25 |
4 |
16.0 |
Total |
676 |
120 |
17.8 |
372 |
58 |
15.6 |
180 |
28 |
15.6 |
(See Tables 15 and 16 for an outline of the salary support options for fellowship candidates.)
[top]
Historical Outcomes for Fellowships
A separate Research Fellowship scheme existed until 2001. In 2002, fellowship proposals were integrated into Discovery Projects. Success rate comparisons are given in Table 13.
Table 13: Numbers of and success rates for fellowship candidates, for funding commencing in calendar years 2002 to 2008
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number requested |
830 |
1,005 |
871 |
1,010 |
1,159 |
1,276 |
1,228 |
Fellowships awarded |
163 |
166 |
161 |
167 |
168 |
197 |
206 |
Success rate % |
19.6% |
16.5% |
18.5% |
16.5% |
14.5% |
15.4% |
16.8% |
[top]
Partnerships to Fund Fellowships
All fellowships are offered on a full-time basis only. However, the ARC offers a number of salary support options in the form of ARC/Administering Organisation joint funding arrangements to enable flexibility in the activities of the researcher.
For APDs, a four-year '75% research and 25% teaching' option was introduced to provide a development opportunity. Under this option, a fellow may spend 25% of her/his time on activities other than the proposed research project, such as teaching. The usual APD is a three-year full-time research position. Of the 676 APDs requested, 126 were for ARC salary funding at 75% over four years.
The ARC offers a 50:50 salary support option for ARF/QEIIs and APFs. Under this option the ARC funds 50% of the salary and salary-related on-costs for research fellows who hold continuing appointments at their organisation, with the Administering Organisation also contributing 50% of the salary and salary-related on-costs over the standard duration of five years. The fellow is supported to conduct full-time research.
Table 14 indicates the number of and success rates for approved APD candidates by salary support option requested.
Table 14: Numbers of and success rates for APD candidates by salary support option
APDs requested |
APDs approved |
Success rate % |
|
|---|---|---|---|
100% ARC salary contribution requested over three years |
550 |
95 |
17.3% |
75% ARC salary contribution requested over four years |
126 |
25 |
19.8% |
Total |
676 |
120 |
17.8% |
Table 15 indicates the number of and success rates for ARF/QEII and APF candidates by salary support option.
Table 15: Numbers of and success rates for ARF/QEII and APF candidates by salary support option
| ARF/QEII | APF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Requested |
Approved |
Success rate % |
Requested |
Approved |
Success rate % |
|
100% ARC salary contribution requested over five years |
284 |
39 |
13.7% |
60 |
4 |
6.7% |
50% ARC salary contribution requested over five years |
88 |
19 |
21.6% |
120 |
24 |
20.0% |
Total |
372 |
58 |
15.6% |
180 |
28 |
15.6% |
Table 16 provides historical figures for fellowships by salary support option, and indicates that in 2008 there is a rise in the number of fellowships funded under joint funding arrangements between the ARC and Administering Organisations.
Table 16: Numbers of fellowship candidates for funding commencing in calendar years 2004 to 2008 by salary support option
Year |
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 or 75% |
100% |
50 or 75% |
100% |
50 or 75% |
100% |
50 or 75% |
100% |
50 or 75% |
100% |
|
APD |
19 |
93 |
14 |
98 |
18 |
92 |
23 |
87 |
25 |
95 |
ARF/QEII |
1 |
32 |
2 |
30 |
5 |
28 |
13 |
45 |
19 |
39 |
APF |
12 |
12 |
9 |
14 |
13 |
12 |
24 |
5 |
24 |
4 |
Total number |
32 |
137 |
25 |
142 |
36 |
132 |
60 |
137 |
68 |
138 |
[top]
Gender of Participants
The total number of nominated researchers (Chief Investigators, Partner Investigators, APFs, ARF/QEIIs and APDs) on all proposals considered was 9,097. Of these, 2,305 (25.3%) are female and 6,792 (74.7%) are male. Success rates by gender are shown in Table 17. In the proposals approved for funding, 485 of nominated researchers (23.3%) are female and 1,595 (76.7%) are male. The overall success rates for female and male investigators is 21.0% and 23.5% respectively.
Table 17: Comparative success rates for participants by gender
Gender |
Number of participants |
Percentage of participants % |
Number of approved participants |
Percentage of approved participants % |
Success rate % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female |
2305 |
25.3% |
485 |
23.3% |
21.0% |
Male |
6792 |
74.7% |
1595 |
76.7% |
23.5% |
Total |
9097 |
100.0% |
2080 |
100.0% |
22.9% |
Of the 854 ECRs nominated on ECR-only proposals, 327 (38.3%) are female and 527 (61.7%) are male. Of the 137 participants on ECR-only proposals approved for funding, 40 (29.2%) are female and 97 (70.8%) are male.
Of the 1,228 nominated fellowship candidates, 404 (32.9%) are female and 824 (67.1%) are male. Of the 206 fellowship candidates approved for funding, 65 (31.6%) are female and 141 (68.4%) are male.
[top]
International Collaboration
Applicants foreshadowed 4,347 instances of collaboration with researchers in 109 overseas locations on 2,118 proposals. Of the 878 proposals approved for funding, 517 foreshadowed 1,135 instances of collaboration with researchers in 75 overseas locations.
The highest incidence of collaboration foreshadowed is with researchers in the USA, accounting for 279 of the proposals approved for funding. The second highest incidence of collaboration foreshadowed is with researchers in the United Kingdom, accounting for 170 of the proposals approved for funding.
Figure 1. Collaborations by location in approved proposals
[top]
Outcomes by Administering Organisation
The following table shows proposal numbers and total ARC funding by Administering Organisation for Discovery Projects for funding commencing in 2008.
Table 18: Numbers of proposals and success rates, for funding commencing in 2008, by Administering Organisation
| Administering Organisation | Proposals considered | Proposals approved | Success rate % | Funding over project life $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Catholic University | 7 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Baker Heart Research Institute | 1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Bond University | 3 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority | 1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Central Queensland University | 7 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Charles Darwin University | 5 |
2 |
40.0 |
585,000 |
| Charles Sturt University | 24 |
3 |
12.5 |
662,196 |
| CSIRO | 2 |
1 |
50.0 |
586,530 |
| Curtin University of Technology | 92 |
9 |
9.8 |
3,070,697 |
| Deakin University | 83 |
4 |
4.8 |
1,533,040 |
| Edith Cowan University | 18 |
1 |
5.6 |
202,593 |
| Flinders University | 64 |
9 |
14.1 |
3,047,575 |
| Griffith University | 112 |
23 |
20.5 |
6,623,272 |
| James Cook University | 46 |
11 |
23.9 |
3,543,124 |
| La Trobe University | 76 |
15 |
19.7 |
4,677,494 |
| Macquarie University | 142 |
36 |
25.4 |
11,048,597 |
| Melbourne College of Divinity | 2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Monash University | 358 |
75 |
20.9 |
27,659,169 |
| Murdoch University | 38 |
5 |
13.2 |
1,293,166 |
| Museum Victoria | 1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Queensland University of Technology | 97 |
24 |
24.7 |
7,287,572 |
| RMIT University | 55 |
5 |
9.1 |
1,066,444 |
| Royal Botanic Gardens and National Herbarium of Victoria | 1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Southern Cross University | 9 |
2 |
22.2 |
660,000 |
| Swinburne University of Technology | 64 |
12 |
18.8 |
4,222,240 |
| The Australian Museum | 2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| The Australian National University | 286 |
78 |
27.3 |
30,827,792 |
| The Australian Wine Research Institute | 2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| The University of Adelaide | 157 |
41 |
26.1 |
14,143,514 |
| The University of Melbourne | 406 |
112 |
27.6 |
38,004,295 |
| The University of New England | 26 |
2 |
7.7 |
402,062 |
| The University of New South Wales | 390 |
87 |
22.3 |
26,004,779 |
| The University of Newcastle | 132 |
31 |
23.5 |
10,353,165 |
| The University of Queensland | 361 |
71 |
19.7 |
28,724,683 |
| The University of Sydney | 391 |
98 |
25.1 |
34,497,035 |
| The University of Western Australia | 166 |
35 |
21.1 |
13,089,935 |
| The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research | 12 |
3 |
25.0 |
965,103 |
| University of Ballarat | 10 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| University of Canberra | 5 |
2 |
40.0 |
555,934 |
| University of South Australia | 68 |
14 |
20.6 |
3,555,526 |
| University of Southern Queensland | 31 |
1 |
3.2 |
187,000 |
| University of Tasmania | 74 |
10 |
13.5 |
2,850,581 |
| University of Technology, Sydney | 90 |
12 |
13.3 |
3,773,676 |
| University of the Sunshine Coast | 2 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| University of Western Sydney | 42 |
12 |
28.6 |
3,755,509 |
| University of Wollongong | 132 |
32 |
24.2 |
11,337,105 |
| Victoria University | 19 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
| Total | 4112 |
878 |
21.4 |
300,796,403 |
[top]
Scheme Budget
The following table shows funds for approved Discovery Projects proposals for commencement in 2008.
Table 19: Funds for approved Discovery Projects proposals for funding commencing in 2008
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$93,479,736 |
$89,676,013 |
$84,934,611 |
$20,714,789 |
$11,991,254 |
$300,796,403 |
26/9/07
