Overview The Discovery Indigenous scheme provides grant funding to support research projects led by an Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander researcher. Discovery Indigenous grants include support for Discovery Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Awards (DAATSIAs) which are fellowships available to eligible Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander researchers. The objectives of the Discovery Indigenous scheme are to: support the retention of excellent Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander researchers in higher education institutions to expand research capacity in Australia; support excellent pure basic, strategic basic and applied research and research training, across all disciplines excluding clinical and other medical research, by Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander researchers as individuals and as teams; enhance the scale and focus of research in Australian Government priority areas and create economic, commercial, environmental, social and/or cultural benefits for Australia; and support national and international research collaboration Selection process Applications for funding commencing in 2026 opened on 20 November 2024 and closed on 20 February 2025. Applications were submitted through the Australian Research Council (ARC) Research Management System (RMS). This report outlines outcomes from the selection process for that round. These recommendations are based on advice from the ARC Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) which: assigned independent assessors to review the applications assessed applications and reviewed assessments made by independent assessors reviewed candidates’ comments on assessors’ reports ranked each application relative to the others on the basis of the application, the assessors’ reports and candidates’ responses to those assessments assessed and recommended budgets; and, advice from the ARC’s National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP) Eligibility Committee which: considered eligibility issues identified by ARC staff, the members of the ARC College of Experts or independent assessors where required, sought advice from the ARC’s Medical Research Advisory Group made recommendations to the CEO in respect of ineligible applications. This report reflects the outcomes approved by the ARC Board. Unless otherwise specified, data represented in this report exclude withdrawn applications. Assessment criteria All applications that met the eligibility criteria for the Discovery Indigenous 2026 applications were assessed and merit ranked using the following assessment criteria: a. Investigator(s)/Capability (35%) Taking into account research opportunity, record of high-quality research outputs appropriate to the discipline(s) evidence of excellence in research training, mentoring and supervision (where appropriate); and the capability of the investigator or team to build collaborations both within Australia and internationally. b. Project quality and innovation (40%) Describe the: contribution to an important gap in knowledge or significant problem; novelty/originality and innovation of the proposed research (including any new methods, technologies, theories or ideas that will be developed); clarity of the hypothesis, theories and research questions; cohesiveness of the project design and implementation plan (including the appropriateness of the aim, conceptual framework, method, data and/or analyses); and extent to which the research has the potential to enhance international collaboration. If the project involves Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander research additional criteria include: the project’s level of collaboration, engagement, relationship building and benefit sharing with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, and First Nations Organisations and Communities; the project’s strategy and mechanisms for Indigenous research capacity building within the project; the project’s level of internal leadership of Indigenous research; the project’s adherence to the Australian Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles; and the project’s understanding of, and proposed strategies to adhere to, the AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research and NHMRC’s guidelines on Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities. c. Benefit (15%) Describe the potential benefits including the: new or advanced knowledge resulting from outcomes of the research; economic, commercial, environmental, social and/or cultural benefits for Australia and international communities; and potential contribution to capacity in the Australian Government priority areas. d. Feasibility (10%) Describe the: cost-effectiveness of the research and its value for money; suitability of the environment for the research team and their project, and for HDR students where appropriate; availability of the necessary facilities to complete the project; and extent to which the project’s design, participants and requested budget create confidence in the timely and successful completion of the project. Assessing the DAATSIA candidate Where an application included provision for a DAATSIA, the candidate was assessed according to the following criteria, taking into account research opportunity: potential to enhance and expedite a high-quality project; location within a suitable research environment that will support the candidate and project; record of high-quality research outputs appropriate to the discipline(s); evidence of excellence in research training, mentoring and supervision (where appropriate); and capability to build collaborations both within Australia and internationally. The recommendation to award the DAATSIA was made separately from the overall application. If the project is funded but the DAATSIA is not awarded, the researcher remained a CI on the project. Assessment process The ARC assessment process for Discovery Indigenous 2026 involved 7 College of Experts members as part of one multidisciplinary panel and was managed in RMS. A total of 106 independent assessors’ reports were submitted to the ARC. Funding levels and duration Funding of between $30,000 and $500,000 per annum for up to 5 consecutive years may be awarded for each Discovery Indigenous application, including, annual salary contributions for Discovery Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Award (DAATSIA) recipients of $121,704 to $257,726 (including 30 per cent on-costs). Summary of outcomes The ARC received a total of 43 applications for Discovery Indigenous for funding commencing in 2026. No applications were withdrawn. Sixteen Discovery Indigenous projects are approved for funding commencing in 2026, shown in Table 1. The overall success rate for Discovery Indigenous for funding commencing in 2026 is 37.2% per cent. A comparison of success rates and funding amounts with the previous round is shown in Table 1. Of the unsuccessful applications in 2026, none were found not to meet eligibility requirements. Table 1. Comparison of application numbers, success rates, requested and allocated funds for approved Discovery Indigenous applications from 2025 to 2026. Funding year Applications considered Applications approved Success rate (%) Requested funds over project life for all applications considered ($) Requested funds over project life for approved applications ($) Funds allocated over project life for approved applications ($) Return rate for approved applications (%) 2025 32 11 34.4 $42,390,433 $14,205,429 $11,008,555 77.5 2026 43 16 37.2 $60,248,895 $21,631,458 $18,478,534 85.4 Discovery Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Award (DAATSIA) Of the 43 applications considered this round, there was funding requested for 20 DAATSIAs at one of 5 salary levels. The overall success rate for Discovery Indigenous DAATSIA requests in 2026 is 35 per cent and is shown in Table 2. Table 2. Success rates for Discovery Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Award (DAATSIA) for approved Discovery Indigenous applications 2026. DAATSIA Salary Level Number of DAATSIAs considered Number of DAATSIAs approved Success rate (%) Salary Level 1 0 0 0 Salary Level 2 6 2 33.3 Salary Level 3 7 3 42.9 Salary Level 4 6 2 33.3 Salary Level 5 1 0 0 Total 20 7 35.0 Outcomes by project discipline A summary of outcomes by project discipline is shown in Table 3. Table 3. Application numbers, success rates and requested and allocated funds for approved Discovery Indigenous 2026 applications by discipline. Discipline* Applications considered Applications approved Success rate (%) Requested funds over project life for all applications considered ($) Requested funds over project life for approved applications ($) Funds over project life for approved applications ($) Return Rate for approved applications (%) BSB 9 4 44.4 $12,729,864 $5,918,379 $5,328,814 90.0 EIC 3 2 66.7 $3,307,928 $2,892,235 $2,112,956 73.1 HCA 14 5 35.7 $19,718,335 $6,133,944 $5,546,934 90.4 MPCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SBE 17 5 29.4 $24,492,768 $6,686,900 $5,489,830 82.1 Total 43 16 37.2 $60,248,895 $21,631,458 $18,478,534 85.4 * BSB – Biological Sciences and Biotechnology; EIC – Engineering, Information and Computing Sciences, HCA – Humanities and Creative Arts; MPCE – Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; SBE – Social, Behavioural and Economic Sciences Note - Project Discipline is determined by the primary FoR codes provided in the application. Outcomes by Administering Organisation A summary of outcomes by Administering Organisation is shown in Table 4. Table 4. Numbers of applications and success rates for approved Discovery Indigenous 2026 applications by Administering Organisation. Administering Organisation Applications Considered Applications Approved Success rate (%) Funds over project life for approved applications ($) Australian Capital Territory 5 3 60.0 $3,597,996 The Australian National University 5 3 60.0 $3,597,996 New South Wales 13 1 7.7 $1,594,446 Australian Catholic University 1 0 0 0 Charles Sturt University 1 0 0 0 Macquarie University 2 0 0 0 The University of New South Wales 1 1 100.0 $1,594,446 The University of Newcastle 1 0 0 0 The University of Sydney 2 0 0 0 University of Technology Sydney 4 0 0 0 University of Wollongong 1 0 0 0 Northern Territory 3 0 0 0 Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education 1 0 0 0 Charles Darwin University 2 0 0 0 Queensland 8 5 62.5 $5,150,332 Griffith University 1 1 100.0 $866,853 James Cook University 1 1 100.0 $652,368 Queensland University of Technology 2 0 0 0 The University of Queensland 4 3 75.0 $3,631,111 South Australia 2 0 0 0 Flinders University 1 0 0 0 University of South Australia 1 0 0 0 Tasmania 1 1 100.0 $1,761,443 University of Tasmania 1 1 100.0 $1,761,443 Victoria 9 6 66.7 $6,374,317 Federation University Australia 1 1 100.0 $436,214 La Trobe University 1 1 100.0 $1,440,539 Monash University 4 3 75.0 $3,239,306 RMIT University 1 1 100.0 $1,258,258 Swinburne University of Technology 2 0 0 0 The University of Melbourne 1 0 0 0 Western Australia 2 0 0 0 Curtin University 2 0 0 0 Total 43 16 37.2 $18,478,534 Career age and gender Of the 140 Chief Investigators (CIs), including 20 DAATSIAs candidates, considered in this round, 78 (55.71%) were female, 61 (43.57%) were male, and 1 (0.71%) was non-binary. The success rate for female, male, and non-binary CIs is 30.77 percent, 39.34 percent and 0 percent respectively. Success rates of CIs by career age and gender in Discovery Indigenous 2026 round are presented in Figure 1. CIs who did not specify the date of completion of their PhD (or equivalent) or who do not hold a PhD are not represented in the figure below. Figure 1. Participation and success rate of CIs in Discovery Indigenous 2026 by gender and career age*^ * Career age is calculated as years since PhD based on the relevant qualification as selected in the application. ^ Calculated career age does not take career interruptions into consideration. Gender by Project Discipline Table 5. Discovery Indigenous 2026: Gender by Project Discipline– submission numbers, applications approved and success rates. Project Discipline Female considered Female approved Female success rate Male considered Male approved Male success rate Non-binary considered Non-binary approved Non-binary success rate BSB 9 4 44% 14 6 43% 0 0 N/A EIC 4 4 100% 10 7 70% 0 0 N/A HCA 24 7 29% 13 6 46% 0 0 N/A MPCE 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A SBE 41 9 22% 24 5 21% 1 0 0 Grand Total 78 24 31% 61 24 39% 0 0 N/A Note – The data provided in the above table is a representation of all Chief Investigators listed on applications considered in IN26. Project Discipline is determined by the primary FoR codes provided in the application. Table 6. Discovery Indigenous 2026: Lead Chief Investigator Gender by Project Discipline – submission numbers, applications approved and success rates. Project Discipline Female considered Female approved Female success rate Male considered Male approved Male success rate Non-binary considered Non-binary approved Non-binary success rate BSB 2 1 50% 7 3 43% 0 0 N/A EIC 0 0 N/A 3 2 67% 0 0 N/A HCA 7 2 29% 7 3 43% 0 0 N/A MPCE 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A SBE 13 5 38% 4 0 0% 0 0 N/A Grand Total 22 8 36% 21 8 38% 0 0 N/A Figure 2. Participation and success rates of Discovery Indigenous 2026 Chief Investigators by gender and project discipline. Note - The data provided in the above table is a representation of all Chief Investigators listed on applications considered in IN26. Project Discipline is determined by the primary FoR codes provided in the application. Table 7. Success rates by gender for Discovery Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Award (DAATSIA) candidates, for approved Discovery Indigenous 2026 applications Gender of DAATSIA candidate No of DAATSIAs considered No of DAATSIAs approved Success rate (%) Female 12 3 25% Male 8 4 50% Total 20 7 35% International Collaboration Among 43 of the applications considered, applicants foreshadowed 55 instances of collaboration with researchers in 18 overseas locations. Of the applications approved for funding, 5 foreshadowed 10 instances of collaboration with researchers in 6 overseas locations (Figure 3). Figure 3 International collaborations by location in approved Discovery Indigenous 2026 applications*. * The international collaboration locations are listed in Figure 3.