[TOC]
The Discovery Projects scheme reflects the Australian Government’s commitment to excellence in research by supporting grant funding to support research projects that may be undertaken by individual researchers or research teams.
The objectives of the Discovery Projects scheme are to:
Applications for funding commencing in 2021 opened on 13 November 2019 and closed on 26 February 2020. Applications were submitted through the Australian Research Council (ARC) Research Management System (RMS). This report outlines recommendations from the ARC Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to the Minister.
These recommendations are based on advice from the ARC Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) which:
and, advice from the ARC’s National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP) Eligibility Committee which:
This report reflects the funding recommendations to the Minister. Unless otherwise specified, data represented in this report exclude withdrawn applications.
All applications that meet the eligibility criteria for the Discovery Projects 2021 applications were assessed and merit ranked using the following assessment criteria:
Investigator(s)/Capability (35%)
Describe:
Project quality and innovation (40%)
Describe the:
Benefit (15%)
Describe the potential benefits including the:
Feasibility (10%)
If the project involves Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research describe:
The ARC assessment process for Discovery Projects 2021 involved 80 College of Experts members across five discipline panels and was managed in RMS. A total of 10,766 independent assessors’ reports were submitted to the ARC.
Funding of between $30,000 and $500,000 per annum for up to five years may be awarded for each Discovery Project application.
The ARC received a total of 3027 applications for Discovery Projects for funding commencing in 2021, of which eight applications were withdrawn.
The overall success rate for Discovery Projects for funding commencing in 2021 is 20.0 per cent, with 603 Discovery Projects approved for funding. A comparison of success rates and funding amounts is shown in Table 1.
Of the unsuccessful applications in 2021, 26 were found not to meet eligibility requirements and five were recommended to, but not funded by the Minister.
Funding year
Applications considered
Applications approved
Success rate (%)
Requested funds over project life for all applications considered ($)
Requested funds over project life for approved applications ($)
Funds allocated over project life for approved applications ($)
Return rate for approved applications (%)
2020
2875
660
23.0
$1,641,948,285
$387,282,768
$284,952,924
73.6
2021
3019
603
20.00
$1,760,327,397
$371,657,208
$260,034,079
70.0
*May include indicative funding amounts
A summary of outcomes by discipline panel is shown in Table 2.
Discipline *
Funds over project life for approved applications ($)
Return Rate for approved applications (%)
BSB
784
164
20.9
$546,806,340
$120,383,480
$83,808,816
69.6
EIC
770
143
18.6
$436,774,699
$88,596,990
$59,928,279
67.6
HCA
292
57
19.5
$127,712,964
$26,118,445
$18,208,630
69.7
MPCE
623
123
19.7
$365,334,622
$75,408,044
$53,722,175
71.2
SBE
550
116
21.1
$283,698,772
$61,150,249
$44,366,179
72.6
Total
20.0
* BSB – Biological Sciences and Biotechnology; EIC – Engineering, Information and Computing Sciences, MPCE – Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; SBE – Social, Behavioural and Economic Sciences; HCA – Humanities and Creative Arts
A summary of outcomes by Science and Research Priorities is shown in Table 3.
Science and Research Priorities
Applications
approved
Approved funds over project life ($)
Advanced manufacturing
489
107
21.9
$44,769,691
Cybersecurity
119
27
22.7
$11,258,471
Energy
140
25
17.9
$11,429,582
Environmental change
407
82
20.1
$36,628,016
Food
124
28
22.6
$13,701,187
Health
334
61
18.3
$26,767,974
Resources
64
7
10.9
$2,816,404
Soil and water
89
14
15.7
$6,609,020
Transport
15
$6,536,512
Unspecified
1171
237
20.2
$99,517,222
Total within Science and Research Priorities
1848
366
19.8
$160,516,857
Percentage within Science and Research Priorities (%)
61.2
60.7
61.7
A summary of outcomes by Administering Organisation is shown in Table 4.
Administering Organisation
Applications Considered
Australian Capital Territory
150
36
24.0
$16,009,115
The Australian National University
34
24.3
$15,120,465
University of Canberra
10
2
$888,650
New South Wales
1016
191
18.8
$83,793,458
Australian Catholic University
23
4
17.4
$1,853,137
Charles Sturt University
5
0
0.0
$0
Macquarie University
101
13.9
$5,142,464
Southern Cross University
16
1
6.3
$364,850
The University of New England
9
The University of New South Wales
306
68
22.2
$32,917,472
The University of Newcastle
88
15.9
$5,191,356
The University of Sydney
261
49
$20,986,078
University of Technology Sydney
115
$9,779,446
University of Wollongong
59
12
20.3
$5,090,233
Western Sydney University
33
6
18.2
$2,468,422
Northern Territory
44.4
$1,624,505
Charles Darwin University
Queensland
461
80
$32,772,255
Bond University
Central Queensland University
25.0
$425,912
Griffith University
86
$6,021,081
James Cook University
13
7.7
$401,000
Queensland University of Technology
15.1
$4,917,549
The University of Queensland
255
47
18.4
$19,787,676
University of Southern Queensland
$941,578
University of the Sunshine Coast
14.3
$277,459
South Australia
212
31
14.6
$13,178,713
Flinders University
44
9.1
$1,725,753
The University of Adelaide
133
21
15.8
$9,227,942
University of South Australia
35
17.1
$2,225,018
Tasmania
52
8
15.4
$3,957,269
University of Tasmania
Victoria
929
210
$90,304,623
Deakin University
67
$4,906,297
Federation University Australia
La Trobe University
54
18.5
$4,182,332
Monash University
317
83
26.2
$35,902,333
RMIT University
$5,740,238
Swinburne University of Technology
17.5
$4,305,887
The University of Melbourne
338
78
23.1
$35,267,536
Victoria University
Western Australia
190
43
$18,394,141
Curtin University
22.0
$4,692,187
Edith Cowan University
28.6
$637,674
Murdoch University
The University of Notre Dame Australia
The University of Western Australia.
$13,064,280
Of the 7118 Chief Investigators (CIs) named in applications in this round, 2110 were female, 4972 were male and 36 chose not to specify their gender. The success rate for female, male and unspecified CIs in this round of Discovery Projects is 20.7 per cent, 19.8 per cent and 13.9 per cent respectively.
Success rates of CIs by career age and gender in the current Discovery Projects round are presented in Figure 1. CIs who did not provide gender information (0.5 per cent) and CIs who did not specify the date of completion of their PhD or who do not hold a PhD (0.8 per cent) are not represented in the figure below.
* Career age is calculated as years since PhD (or equivalent). The earliest PhD award date was used where there was more than one PhD.
Among 3019 of the applications considered, applicants foreshadowed 4862 instances of collaboration with researchers in 107 overseas locations. Of the applications approved for funding, 503 foreshadowed 1029 instances of collaboration with researchers in 69 overseas locations (Figure 2).
*The top 10 international collaboration locations are listed in Figure 2 and the remaining locations are grouped in the ‘Other’ category.