Policy Review of the NCGP - FAQs

Purpose

Why was the National Competitive Grants Program being reviewed? 

The National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP) was being reviewed to ensure it remains effective and relevant in supporting high-quality research that addresses the evolving needs of the Australian research sector. The review aims to maximise the impact of public investment in university research and ensure the program is well-aligned with national priorities.

What were the main objectives of the review? 

The main objectives of the review were to: 

• Assess the current strengths and weaknesses of the NCGP
• Ensure the program is well-designed and fit for purpose in building and supporting Australia’s research capacity and capability
• Enhance the program’s ability to deliver visible returns on public investment through strengthened collaboration between the research sector and industry
• Align the NCGP with other government programs that support and invest in research.

Will the ARC publish stakeholder responses to the policy review consultations? 

At its discretion, the ARC may publish submissions (with consent) following the second round of consultations and the delivery of the final report to Government in later 2025. 

All individuals and organisations who submitted a response to either consultation period are welcome to publish their own submission. 

Key Findings

What were the significant initial findings of the review? 

Key initial findings included the need to simplify schemes and reduce complexity, drive and support the best early-stage research, and deepen collaboration across the full research spectrum – including with industry and other end-users. The full findings are on p17-18 of the Policy Review of the National Competitive Grants Program Discussion Paper: A new plan for ARC funded research.

How did the ARC come to these findings?

In early 2024 the ARC held 42 in-person or virtual workshops across Australia with leaders from 35 universities, over 100 ARC College of Expert members, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers and research leaders, and 20 major peak bodies including the Learned Academies. The ARC also received 95 submissions to the first Policy Review Discussion paper.

How does the review align with broader reform processes across Government?

The Review will ensure that the NCGP aligns and contributes to: 

• the ARC’s renewed role and purpose as defined in the Object of the Act under the recently amended Australian Research Council Act 2001
• the Government response to the Review of the Australian Research Council Act 2001 (ARC Review)
• recommendations set out in the Australian Universities Accord Final Report (Accord).  

Stakeholder Impact

How will the outcomes of the review affect researchers and institutions?

The review will affect researchers and institutions by: 

• introducing a more streamlined and efficient funding process,
• allowing researchers to apply for funding based on the scale of their project, rather than the nature of their research,
• providing greater opportunities for collaboration, and
• ensuring that funding decisions are aligned with the ARC Board strategy and, where appropriate, national research priorities. 

Researchers and institutions can expect a more transparent and fair assessment process, as well as increased support for innovative and impactful research projects.

What support will the ARC provide to researchers and institutions in managing changes that will arise from the review?

The ARC understands that successful implementation of the new NCGP will require a thoughtful transition, which must occur in partnership with universities. 

We are committed to continue working with the university sector and other stakeholders at each turn to ensure the transition is as smooth as possible.