Selection Report: ARC Centres of Excellence 2020
[TOC]
Overview
The ARC Centres of Excellence scheme aims to enhance and develop Australia’s research excellence through highly innovative and collaborative research, as well as build Australia’s human capacity in a range of research areas.
The ARC Centres of Excellence are prestigious foci of expertise through which high-quality researchers maintain and develop Australia’s international standing in research areas of national priority.
Through the ARC Centres of Excellence, significant collaborations occur between universities, publicly funded research organisations, other research bodies, governments and businesses in Australia and overseas, all to support outstanding research.
Selection process
Expressions of Interest (EOIs) for ARC Centres of Excellence commencing in 2020 opened on 23 May 2018 and closed on 4 July 2018. Shortlisted EOIs were invited to submit full applications, which opened on 10 October 2018 and closed on 19 December 2018. EOIs and full applications were submitted through the Australian Research Council (ARC) Research Management System (RMS). This report outlines recommendations from the selection process for that round.
The recommendations are based on advice from a Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) which:
- assessed EOIs, reviewed assessments made by independent readers and reviewed applicants’ comments on assessor reports
- shortlisted EOIs for submission of full applications
- assessed full applications, reviewed assessments made by independent readers and reviewed applicants’ comments on assessor reports
- interviewed applicants
- ranked each application relative to the others on the basis of the application, the assessor reports, applicants’ responses to those assessments and interview performance
- assessed and recommended budgets;
and advice from the ARC Eligibility Committee which:
- considered eligibility issues identified by ARC staff, the SAC or independent assessors.
This report reflects the outcomes approved by the Minister.
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria and corresponding weights for EOI applications are:
- Research program - Quality and Innovation (70%)
- Investigators (30%)
Assessment criteria and corresponding weights for full applications are:
- Research program - Quality and Innovation (20%)
- Investigators (20%)
- Institutional Support (20%)
- Governance, leadership and mentoring (20%)
- Outcomes and linkages (20%)
The ARC assessment and reporting process for ARC Centres of Excellence used a panel of 18 SAC members during the EOI phase and 15 SAC members during the full application phase and was managed in RMS. A total of 258 independent assessor reports were submitted to the ARC for EOI applications and 67 for full applications.
Summary of Outcomes
The ARC received 93 EOIs and invited 20 EOIs to submit full applications. Of the 20 ARC Centres of Excellence applications submitted, nine were recommended for funding.
As shown in Table 1, the overall success rate was 45 per cent, which was the same percentage for the previous ARC Centres of Excellence 2017 round.
Table 1. Number of EOIs, applications and success rates for ARC Centres of Excellence 2020 by discipline panel
|
Panel* |
EOIs considered |
EOIs shortlisted |
EOI success rate (%) |
Applications considered |
Applications approved |
Application success rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BSB |
24 |
4 |
16.7 |
4 |
2 |
50.0 |
|
EIC |
18 |
2 |
11.1 |
2 |
2 |
100.0 |
|
HCA |
9 |
3 |
33.3 |
3 |
1 |
33.3 |
|
MPCE |
22 |
5 |
22.7 |
5 |
2 |
40.0 |
|
SBE |
20 |
6 |
30.0 |
6 |
2 |
33.3 |
|
Total |
93 |
20 |
21.5 |
20 |
9 |
45.0 |
*BSB = Biological Sciences and Biotechnology; EIC = Engineering, Information and Computing Sciences; HCA = Humanities and Creative Arts; MPCE = Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences; SBE = Social, Behavioural and Economics Sciences
Outcomes of approved ARC Centres of Excellence
Table 2 lists summary information on the approved ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020.
Table 2. Details of approved ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020*
|
ARC Centres of Excellence Title |
Administering Organisation |
Centre Director |
Total Allocated Funding |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society |
RMIT University |
Professor Julian Thomas |
$31,783,576 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for Dark Matter Particle Physics |
The University of Melbourne |
Professor Elisabetta Barberio |
$35,000,000 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for Enabling Eco-Efficient Beneficiation of Minerals |
The University of Newcastle |
Professor Kevin Galvin |
$35,000,000 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for Transformative Meta-Optical Systems |
The Australian National University |
Professor Dragomir Neshev |
$34,935,113 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science |
The University of Queensland |
Professor David Craik |
$35,000,000 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture |
The University of Queensland |
Professor Christine Beveridge |
$35,000,000 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child |
Queensland University of Technology |
Professor Susan Danby |
$34,934,591 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course |
The University of Queensland |
Professor Janeen Baxter |
$32,137,007 |
|
ARC Centre of Excellence in Synthetic Biology |
Macquarie University |
Professor Ian Paulsen |
$35,000,000 |
*May include indicative funding amounts
Outcomes by Administering Organisation
Administering Organisations in seven Australian States and Territories submitted applications for ARC Centres of Excellence. In addition to ARC funding, significant contributions are made by participating organisations as shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Numbers of EOIs and full applications, success rates and approved ARC funding for ARC Centres of Excellence applications for funding in 2020 by Administering Organisation*#
|
Administering Organisation |
EOIs considered |
EOIs shortlisted |
EOI success rate |
Applications considered |
Applications approved |
Application success rate |
Total allocated funding amount |
Participating organisation contributions (cash & in-kind for approved applications) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Australian Capital Territory |
6 |
2 |
33.3 |
2 |
1 |
50.0 |
$34,935,113 |
$34,402,574 |
|
The Australian National University |
6 |
2 |
33.3 |
2 |
1 |
50.0 |
$34,935,113 |
$35,402,574 |
|
New South Wales |
36 |
4 |
11.1 |
4 |
2 |
50.0 |
$70,000,000 |
$88,981,288 |
|
Australian Catholic University |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Macquarie University |
5 |
1 |
20.0 |
1 |
1 |
100.0 |
$35,000,000 |
$61,062,693 |
|
The University of New South Wales |
7 |
1 |
14.3 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
The University of Newcastle |
6 |
1 |
16.7 |
1 |
1 |
100.0 |
$35,000,000 |
$27,918,595 |
|
The University of Sydney |
11 |
1 |
9.10 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
University of Technology, Sydney |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
University of Wollongong |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Western Sydney University |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Queensland |
13 |
4 |
30.8 |
4 |
4 |
100.0 |
$137,071,598 |
$194,526,436 |
|
Griffith University |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
James Cook University |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Queensland University of Technology |
2 |
1 |
50.0 |
1 |
1 |
100.0 |
$34,934,591 |
$32,239,197 |
|
The University of Queensland |
9 |
3 |
33.3 |
3 |
3 |
100.0 |
$102,137,007 |
$162,287,239 |
|
South Australia |
6 |
1 |
20.0 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
The University of Adelaide |
5 |
1 |
20.0 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
Flinders University |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Tasmania |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
University of Tasmania |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Victoria |
28 |
9 |
32.1 |
9 |
2 |
22.2 |
$66,783,576 |
$129,734,071 |
|
Deakin University |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
La Trobe University |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Monash University |
7 |
1 |
14.3 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
RMIT University |
1 |
1 |
100.0 |
1 |
1 |
100.0 |
$31,783,576 |
$39,344,634 |
|
Swinburne University of Technology |
2 |
1 |
50.0 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
|
The University of Melbourne |
15 |
6 |
40.0 |
6 |
1 |
16.7 |
$35,000,000 |
$90,389,437 |
|
Western Australia |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Curtin University |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total |
93 |
20 |
21.5 |
20 |
9 |
45.0 |
$308,790,287 |
$448,644,369 |
* Participating Organisations include the Administering Organisation, Other Eligible Organisations and Partner Organisations.
# Participating Organisation contributions are shown by organisation type in Table 4.
Participating organisation contributions by organisation type
As shown in Table 4, contributions to ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020 from Partner Organisations total over $151 million, 40 per cent of the total organisation contributions to successful ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020.
Table 4. Participating organisation contributions by organisation type for approved ARC Centres of Excellence applications for funding in 2020
|
Organisation type |
Organisation contributions (cash & in-kind) over project life (recommended applications) |
|---|---|
|
Administering Organisation |
$128,754,602 |
|
Other Eligible Organisation |
$168,728,562 |
|
Partner Organisation |
$151,161,205 |
|
Total |
$448,584,369 |
Partner Organisation contributions by sector
Partner Organisations were identified as either Australian, international, government, non-profit, industry or overseas higher education organisations.
Leverage of ARC funding
Of the 20 applications considered, nine were approved with a total funding, over the life of these projects, of $308,790,287. There are 154 Partner Organisations involved, committing a total of $151,161,205 in cash and in-kind funding. This represents $0.49 from Partner Organisations for every dollar of funding from the ARC.
The Partner Organisation contributions in these categories for applications approved for funding in 2020 are shown below in Table 5.
Table 5. Partner Organisation contributions by sector for approved ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020
| Type | Cash | In-kind | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | % | $ | % | $ | % | ||
| Industry Body | |||||||
| Australian | $4,544,000 | 39.47 | $10,808,907 | 7.74 | $15,352,907 | 10.16 | |
| International | $1,054,800 | 9.16 | $38,691,665 | 27.71 | $39,746,465 | 26.29 | |
| Sub-total | $5,598,800 | 48.63 | $49,500,572 | 35.45 | $55,099,372 | 36.45 | |
| Non-Profit | |||||||
| Australian | $2,947,783 | 25.6 | $4,842,026 | 3.47 | $7,789,809 | 5.15 | |
| International | $0 | 0 | $350,000 | 0.25 | $350,000 | 0.23 | |
| Sub-total | $2,947,783 | 25.6 | $5,192,026 | 3.72 | $8,139,809 | 5.38 | |
| Government | |||||||
| Australian state, territory and local government | $1,003,113 | 8.71 | $1,855,945 | 1.33 | $2,859,078 | 1.89 | |
| International | $0 | 0 | $350,000 | 0.25 | $350,000 | 0.23 | |
| Australian Federal Government | $1,120,000 | 9.73 | $9,581,860 | 6.86 | $10,701,860 | 7.08 | |
| Sub-total | $2,123,133 | 18.44 | $11,787,805 | 8.44 | $13,910,938 | 9.2 | |
| Other | |||||||
| Other | $591,000 | 5.13 | $13,594,600 | 9.73 | $14,185,600 | 9.38 | |
| Sub-total | $591,000 | 5.13 | $13,594,600 | 9.73 | $14,185,600 | 9.38 | |
| Education | |||||||
| International | $252,000 | 2.19 | $59,573,486 | 42.66 | $59,825,486 | 39.58 | |
| Sub-total | $252,000 | 2.19 | $59,573,486 | 42.66 | $59,825,486 | 39.58 | |
| Total | $11,512,716 | 100 | $139,648,489 | 100 | $151,161,205 | 100 | |
Note: All totals and percentages are shown using rounded figures, and as such may not sum.
Science and Research Priorities
As shown in Table 6, all applications for ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020 selected a Science and Research Priority.
Table 6. Approved funding for ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020 by Science and Research Priority
|
Science and Research Priority |
Applications submitted* |
Applications approved |
Success Rate (%) |
Allocated Funding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Advanced manufacturing |
9 |
4 |
44.4 |
$139,935,113 |
|
Cybersecurity |
1 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
Food |
1 |
1 |
100.0 |
$35,000,000 |
|
Health |
2 |
1 |
50.0 |
$31,783,576 |
|
Resources |
1 |
1 |
100.0 |
$35,000,000 |
|
Transport |
1 |
0 |
0 |
$0 |
|
Unspecified |
5 |
2 |
40.0 |
$67,071,598 |
|
Total |
20 |
9 |
45.0 |
$308,790,287 |
|
Total within Science and Research Priorities |
15 |
7 |
46.7 |
$241,718,689 |
|
Percentage within Science and Research Priorities (%) |
75.0 |
77.8 |
|
78.3 |
Outcomes by Field of Research Categories
Table 7. Application data by Field of Research category for ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020
|
Field of Research category |
Applications submitted |
Applications approved |
Allocated Funding |
Participating Organisation contributions (cash & in-kind) over project life (approved applications) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mathematical Sciences |
1 |
0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
Physical Sciences |
3 |
1 |
$35,000,000 |
$90,389,437 |
|
Chemical Sciences |
1 |
1 |
$35,000,000 |
$53,997,836 |
|
Biological Sciences |
4 |
2 |
$70,000,000 |
$136,313,769 |
|
Engineering |
1 |
1 |
$35,000,000 |
$27,918,595 |
|
Technology |
1 |
1 |
$34,935,113 |
$35,402,574 |
|
Education |
1 |
1 |
$34,934,591 |
$32,239,197 |
|
Economics |
1 |
0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
Studies in Human Society |
3 |
1 |
$32,137,007 |
$33,038,327 |
|
Psychology and Cognitive Sciences |
2 |
0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
Language, Communication and Culture |
1 |
1 |
$31,783,576 |
$39,344,634 |
|
Philosophy and Religious Studies |
1 |
0 |
$0 |
$0 |
|
Total |
20 |
9 |
$308,790,287 |
$448,644,369 |
Gender
A total of 599 participants were named on applications considered in this round. Of these, 389 were male and 207 were female and three were unspecified. The success rates for male and female participants in this round are 44.9 per cent and 47.8 per cent respectively. Of the nine funded Centre Directors, four are female and five are male.
International collaboration
International collaboration is an important component of ARC Centres of Excellence. Overall, the approved applications indicate collaboration with 26 countries. Data relating to international collaboration is shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Instances of International Collaboration on approved ARC Centres of Excellence for funding in 2020 applications
|
Country |
Number of submitted applications with international collaboration |
Number of approved applications with international collaboration |
|---|---|---|
|
Belgium |
2 |
1 |
|
Brazil |
3 |
2 |
|
Canada |
6 |
2 |
|
Chile |
1 |
0 |
|
China (excluded SARs and Taiwan) |
11 |
7 |
|
Denmark |
4 |
3 |
|
England |
19 |
9 |
|
Fiji |
1 |
1 |
|
Finland |
2 |
2 |
|
France |
4 |
2 |
|
Germany |
14 |
6 |
|
Hong Kong (SAR of China) |
6 |
1 |
|
India |
1 |
1 |
|
Indonesia |
1 |
0 |
|
Ireland |
2 |
2 |
|
Israel |
1 |
1 |
|
Italy |
2 |
1 |
|
Japan |
6 |
2 |
|
Korea, Republic of (South) |
3 |
2 |
|
Luxembourg |
1 |
1 |
|
Mexico |
2 |
0 |
|
Netherlands |
6 |
2 |
|
New Zealand |
5 |
2 |
|
Norway |
2 |
1 |
|
Poland |
3 |
0 |
|
Scotland |
5 |
1 |
|
Singapore |
9 |
5 |
|
South Africa |
1 |
0 |
|
Spain |
1 |
1 |
|
Sweden |
5 |
4 |
|
Switzerland |
1 |
0 |
|
Taiwan |
2 |
0 |
|
Thailand |
1 |
0 |
|
United States of America |
19 |
9 |
|
Wales |
1 |
0 |
|
Total |
153 |
71 |